is there still the "assign" command? - PCFreunde.de
At least you could have let them know that you have got the problem under control in the meantime ...
is there still the "assign" command? - PCFreunde.de
At least you could have let them know that you have got the problem under control in the meantime ...
So, since this is an AGP GraKa with 64 MB, I believe that it cannot display this resolution at all.
Unfortunately, there is no clear indication of possible resolutions on the NVIDIA HP (but I now know exactly how many triangles the chip can display at the same time ).
The best thing to do is to consult a manual from the manufacturer of the card, as it usually starts with the supported resolutions including color depth. Since you did not name the manufacturer, I unfortunately had to google it myself
Before we have more detailed information, it doesn't make sense to think about drivers and the like. to do ... in the end we only break what should not have been changed.
After I also know how it works with the frequencies ...
I would like to doubt that here, otherwise you would have understood that what you want is not possible.
Please to a mod: close this topic, it does not lead to any further discussion ...
So, let's talk about the (very simplified) functionality of a TV card:
the receiver (the silver part on the card) only receives the signals that come in, it could also be digital because it doesn't care, it just forwards it. The decoder chip then turns the signals that the receiver receives into individual television stations. To do this, he chooses the frequencies that belong to a transmitter from the garbage that comes in.
An analog chip only has to separate the frequencies, a digital one also has to calculate an image from the signals itself.
So it makes no sense to tinker with or adjust the receiver. You would have to replace the decoder chip. That costs including the new driver that you would have to write development costs of around 2500 €
So you are welcome to send me the card, I and my staff will be happy to help you
Otherwise all that remains is to buy a new card ...
Well, then I'll put it differently:
NO IT'S NOT POSSIBLE!!!!
I hope that was understandable now.
Simple answer:
HA !!!
Apart from the fact that a simply installed XP already gives a lot of information about the use of the PC (after all, almost everything logs with)
There are also very good programs that can monitor the computer, depending on how they are installed, even completely unnoticed by the user.
BUT: If the employer does not explicitly inform his staff (or the one monitored employee) about the monitoring BEFORE, he makes himself liable to prosecution.
In such a case you should think carefully about what you have done with the company lap and then decide whether you want to do the stress to yourself.
[personal opinion]
Personally, I would send back a nice letter:
Since, in my opinion, I could not find any "deviations" from the permitted use of the device that would be relevant to termination, and recording usage data about employees without respecting data protection can have both civil and criminal consequences for you, you should think again very carefully about my severance payment amount ...
[/personal opinion]
Of course, only works if you are sure that you have not done anything illegal with the company device ...
In any case, you should go to the lawyer with it (but be honest with them, if you've done crap, they can't help either)
How did you want to "protect" the USB stick?
This is a program to encrypt files and folders?!? This does not protect sticks.
And where did the computer crash? When installing the program? When encrypting a folder?
Incidentally, even the administrator does not always have access rights to drives and folders !! So that doesn't mean that you have admin rights. It would be more interesting which user rights are assigned (for the USB sticks and / or the folders)
What do you mean by the sticks work on other computers? Can be formatted there? Or open the protected folder (then it could be due to a wrong passphrase?)
It is possible that access protection is only running in the background, which generally prevents access to USB sticks (so it would be important to know which security software is on it)
If it does not display the content, what kind of error message does the computer output (just "do not display" would mean that there is nothing on it either ...)
The best thing would be to contact the service of the program manufacturer, who should know whether his program changes access rights.
@streetdevil
he does not mean the programs that start automatically, but the entries in the start menu ...
@robinwood
since you've found the list of installed programs, you can stop looking. That's the only thing you'll find (on the hard drive)
The entries searched for under "recently used programs" are not actually saved on the FP, but only the path details are noted in the registry (the corresponding entries are under "RECENT")
With this search term you can also find all other "recently used" lists in the registry (with the respective program), e.g. recently used docs (recently used documents ..., with Office)
That can be relatively normal, sometimes it takes a while before Win / notices that the remote computer is already off. It is not always asked in real time whether the computer is already off.
If the suspicion persists, then check first whether the "son PC" is sending / receiving data when it is off. Even if he is not currently uploading / downloading anything, there should be network traffic when the PC is switched on (so if nothing is, none is on)
The easiest way would be to set up a test release on the son's PC and see whether it can be accessed from outside (if a hacker really is at work, it would be unlikely that he would have the same releases as you)
The best thing to do is to take a photo of the screen with the MemTest error messages using a digital camera or mobile phone camera.
That helps a lot when complaining
So at least they don't have a chance to talk about it.
Well, unfortunately it looks like this
I don't know if you've already done it, test the bars one by one. Sometimes it is not due to a defect, but to RAMs that work poorly together.
To be on the safe side, try the defective RAM bar again in a different slot, sometimes it's just because of the wrong order (sounds illogical, but it really exists!)
But it is probably really broken when it reports so many defective memory areas.
So people you are looking in the completely wrong place !!
The EventID 41 only says one thing: The computer was restarted WITHOUT being shut down (it is completely logical, because of the blue screen it could not shut down properly )
This is what he complains about:
Bug check code 26
BugcheckParameter1 0x41790
These are error codes from the memory management, which means that it has not "found" a memory address
Either RAM defective or two RAM bars that do not match properly.
The best thing is to throw in a MemTest BootCD and test the RAM
(The memory diagnosis tool included in Windows 7 can be safely forgotten at the moment, as half of all errors cannot be found )
PS: I would rather keep my hands off the nice Fixhelpmate program, it finds "ghost errors". In my opinion this is scareware, but certainly not a serious program ...
or that you have a program with which you can use USB-to-LAN
And where did you want to put which plug? USB plug of the camera in the network card? Or a USB-A <> B between hub and LAN?
Quote(is faster than USB alone, transfer would then be via LAN)
Huh what??
If the data only comes with 2Mbit, how should it "magically" become 10 Mbit all at once? In that the program or the adapter ... invents the rest of it, clairvoyance, conjures up from the wormhole?
There are active USB extensions that work with an RJ-45 cable, but that is still "normal" USB, only connected with another cable. The only thing they do is a kind of "signal amplification" so that you can move the printer further away ... and instead of faster they only make the whole thing slower, because the data for the other "transport route" must first be converted.
If you want your USB to get faster, then only one thing helps, check all USB devices and replace those that are too slow ....
Very simple answer: no!
A little more detailed:
The maximum speed of USB is determined by the chip used (or its programming). And if it can't do USB 2.0, then that's the way it is.
However, I have already received two programs that supposedly should be able to do that. In the end, they just suppressed the message ...
Theoretically, with some USB devices there is the possibility to flash a new program yourself, similar to a firmware update with a card reader (whether this really increases the speed or just pretends the OS is faster ...)
But I don't know of a "normal" USB hub that would have a programmable chip. In addition, it is very unlikely to find something ready on the Internet, I think you would have to write it yourself anyway.
In addition, the speed not only depends on the hub, almost no storage medium even reaches the maximum possible speed.
Depending on the age of the DV camera, it may well be that it cannot deliver any more data ... for which there could be a real firmware update from the manufacturer.
Hello, first of all I'm new here and have a problem and need URGENT HELP
I had installed windows vista on windows xp and for what reasons it became functionless then I installed the xp again with windows xp cd and thought that I would then reinstall windows vista but it is now net there was 192mb ram and I set it in bios and now I have 240mb ram and windows vista to install you need 512 mb but why is it now even though I had already installed it 1 time
>>>> Urgent Help <<<
Uh, WHAT ???
So, did you upgrade to Vista?
And that has "somehow become inoperable"?
Then you will probably have made an upgrade with a trial version without a license ...
And then you reinstalled XP (how, even without a license number?)
And now you can no longer "upgrade" to Vista?
Actually also logical, upgrades only go to legal XP installations ...
And on the subject
Quotethere was 192mb ram and I set it in bios and now I have 240mb
First the question remains where was what 192MB RAM (there are no 192MB RAM bars .... 240s, however, either) and what have you changed where ....
How much RAM is actually installed?
It is very nice (or rather less nice) that you need URGENT HELP, but unfortunately you cannot be helped like this.
Have the empty directories been empty for a long time? Or does it only happen when you have just "emptied" a directory?
- (check write cache, deactivate for this disk)
Are they self-created directories or possibly which a program has created there? Are there any hidden files in the directories that are still being accessed?
- (possibly connect the hard drive only when the computer is already on, and then try to delete it first)
Have the directories been created on another computer?
- (with NTFS drives, access rights and ownership rights are taken over from the respective computer when a folder is created)
Does the error occur on several computers or only on one?
(Possibly a write protection active on one computer?)
btw. why does FAT32 make no sense on a terabyte FP?
It is not FAT32 that causes Windows 2000 / XP to refuse formatting. The file system theoretically supports hard disks up to 2 terabytes.
Gern geschehen.
Unfortunately it took a while, I had a lot of trouble trying to recreate the error. In the end, on my old Athlon 1600+, I "quickly" Installed a Win7 test version, only then did it work. However, the update went through anyway, took almost 13 hours ...
In any case, thank you for writing the solution in here!
Is the external hard drive possibly also connected to a media player or DVD player?
I only have this and another related problem with the two external disks that also contain films.
However, only if the hard drive is formatted with NTFS (which is usually the case with external ones, because XP does not readily format it FAT ...)
For me it is because the DVD player reads the hard drive, BUT because it can't quite cope with the "table of contents" from NTFS, it writes a kind of its own on the hard drive (but you can't see it in Explorer)
Then when I add or delete files, the new ones aren't there and the old ones are still there ...
Therefore the tip to everyone, best format external disks FAT 32 (there is a nice tool for ), the only exception, if you then have files> 4GB, FAT is of course no longer possible.
Well, I once tried to recreate the whole thing, due to the lack of hardware (I only have decent laptops, no netbook comes into my house ) I could only test the whole thing with a very old computer.
It looks like the behavior for slow PCs and netbooks seems to be normal, the updates that are pulled are apparently not WSS updates either, but rather for Windows ...
(I haven't found any updates for SteadyState in the last 6 months?!?)
The delay on slow computers seems to be due to the fact that Disk Protection only makes the updates in the cache FOR THE FIRST TIME, and only AFTER all the updates have been completed does it write it to the hard drive in one go ...
And with a netbook with less memory (and for WSS or Disk Protection everything under 512 MB is "little") that unfortunately takes a while.
I hope that the updates have worked anyway, albeit with a delay (well, the computer should have done it in 12 days )
This is only the case in the present case.
I'll just try to explain:
There is the possibility to "distribute" XP over a server, an image of an installed XP is stored on the server (already installed with all additional software), which is then loaded over the network.
After the start, XP then checks whether there is a valid license for this computer (for EXACTLY this computer) on the server. For this purpose, the computer (not the user) is stored on the server with IP and MAC, ie "registered". So has nothing to do with the registration of the XP (but is called the same)
IT students in particular like to use this to provide them with test versions of operating systems and other software for a limited period of time during their studies.
(Hence my suspicion, because a quote said something about a BA ?? Berufsakademie ??. Probably the nice person his girlfriend at the time would have installed one of his training licenses on his computer ...)
Sometimes this technology is then also used with HORM (Hibernate once resume many), which means that the computer no longer loads the entire image, but only the hibernate file, which extremely speeds up loading times.